You Just Might Be a Reality-Phile

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/you-just-might-be-a-reality-phile/

If the last few years have made you dizzy, with their bewildering top-down science, gaslighting media, and deceitful, stonewalling governments, you just might be a Reality-phile.

If you lament the dishonest jiggering of just about everything—algorithms, elections, women’s sports, immigration, medicine, markets, law, AI, and all species of critical data—you just might be a Reality-phile.

If you can’t fathom how your old Propaganda Studies professor could continue reading and reciting to The New York Times with the pious gullibility of a simple child, you just might be a Reality-phile.

If you think it’s a brain-dead move for a nation to progressively dumb down its education, discard the most basic testing for competence, and open up marijuana “dispensaries” on almost every other corner, you just might be a Reality-Phile.

If you continually blink at the latest shrill hallucinations of runaway delusion—junior high school kids claiming to be trans-species rabbits, say (and even worse, terrified principals bowing down to their bunny-hops and proliferating pronouns)—you just might be a Reality-phile. (While true gender dysphoria may indeed exist, the current super-trend is surely charged more by social contagion than by reality.)

If you instinctively reject other divisive and reality-rending cultural-Marxist assertions—e.g., that race is essential, immutable, and apparently the most important characteristic of a person (—the paradoxically racist claim of “anti-racists”), but that gender is fluid and self-willed (—regardless of the constraints of biology and sex), you just might be a Reality-phile.

If you look with astonishment at reckless currency-printing and stratospheric national debt—and know that unsustainable bubbles can never last—you just might be a Reality-phile.

And if some of your family looks upon you with vague condescension, coolly declining to open links you send them—national data on vaccine injury, say, or evidence of Deep State/Big Tech subversion of the First Amendment—while somberly intoning that they “don’t want to encourage your conspiratorial folly,” again, you just might be a Reality-phile.

Reality-Philia, a Rare Bird

It shouldn’t be so rare, Reality-philia, but these days it seems to have become as rare as a funny comedian or a liberal who believes in free speech. Or a judge who respects the law.

Reality-philia, or “love of reality”—a conceptual framework aligned with clear-sighted living—is the simplest and (one would think) most desirable way to be in the world—the best way to keep one’s feet firmly on the ground.

But it seems that good old terra firma is a bit too mundane for some people, a bit too musty and old-fashioned—the new Jacobins strive to stand reason on its head—if not trash it altogether. This wanton idiocy is what springs from too many delirious days at college barricading oneself inside buildings (in solidarity with Che Guevara)—but forgetting to pack a lunch for the Revolution.

Reality-philia assumes that the most competent way to live is in harmony with the data gathered by the senses and evaluated by the mind, and also—because we can’t figure out everything ourselves—by consulting other non-insane people and the accumulated experience of the human race. And our highest wisdom is spiritual wisdom. Nothing crazy about that.

Sanity also rejects inflexible ideology, especially utopian ideology, which invariably distorts reality into fantastic illusion—and when given too much state power, almost always leads to pyramids of skulls touching the sky.

Human progress has been proportional to our understanding of how things really are (e.g., the laws of nature, physics, economy, etc.) and our response to it. When we grasp these correctly, we climb the ladder of progress; when we lose our grip, we fall, often injuring or crippling ourselves for decades—or even generations and centuries.

Homo sapiens considers itself a clever animal—and it is, technically—but today a good number of our species has a less accurate map of the world than does the average barn swallow. The human being has almost always been more clever than wise.

The West in particular, softened by affluence, slovenly education, and runaway magical thinking, has an appointment with reality the same way that a watermelon dropped from an airplane has a gravitational rendezvous with the earth. It may be wonderful fun on the way down, but always ends badly.

No, We Are Not “–phobes,” but Reality-Philes

Here we’ve only just briefly touched upon Reality-Philia, a new name for an old and reliable mode of being—which millions will instantly recognize in this surreal and ridiculous time. These clear-headed millions benefit from the instinct towards truth. (Unlike tyrannosaurs from the Potomac swamp, who bewail the loss of “total control” if centralized state power can’t squash the citizens’ free exchange of information, opinion, and satire.)

Most truth-seekers presently slandered and slighted as “conspiracy theorists” and “—phobes” and “—ists” and “—deniers” are of course none of those things: they are just everyday people craving clarifying doses of correct and authentic thinking. These people are simply Reality-Philes.

In 1984, George Orwell wrote that “freedom is the freedom to say that two and two make four.” I recall the strangeness of that line when I first read it in 8th grade—why would anyone be prevented from uttering such simple math?

Now, though, we can feel Orwell’s point all too chillingly. A key demoralization strategy of totalitarianism is to alienate the individual not only from others but also from themselves—from their core sense of reality. With each ridiculous thing they can get us to accept—or to stay silent about—the more they can advance. Hence the need to push back, speak up, and mock the naked emperors amidst the dystopian confusion. All this broken thinking must be swiftly swept away because Reality has no mercy on fools.

The game’s not over—and Reality of course will win. The only question is who will be left in the stadium (or anywhere) when the final fool strikes out.

 

Truman Verdun is the author of two brief books on mass formation and the editor/translator of an accurate and readable 21st century version of Gustave Le Bon’s classic text, The Psychology of Crowds.

21 Likes

I can’t understand why, as amazing as AI is, it still can spell when generating graphics.

2 Likes

Agreed, Clayfarmer. I don’t understand that flaw either, but with these pics anyway, the misspellings are welcome because they help suggest the warps and wobbles of emerging techno-woke dystopia.

I’m frankly hoping that AI art keeps on looking identifiably weird because then it will continue to betray its origin–the “glitch in the matrix.”

As the old Irish proverb goes, “May God twist the ankles of our enemies so we can know them by their limping.”

(n.b. the article itself is entirely organic and pressed like apples through the brain and fingers.)

9 Likes

But by “can” you meant “can’t” . :rofl: Had me going for a bit. 10am on a Saturday is a bit early for me to be thinking.

2 Likes

The urge to repair these errors is strong, but there is a certain beauty in leaving them as they are in the context of the words around them.
#irony

6 Likes

If I may play off of one of your excellent statements: “AI has almost always been more clever than wise”.

4 Likes

My friend uses the term “Reality Junkie.”

3 Likes

Dammit, I just blew green tea out my nose.
Too funny, too true.

2 Likes

It’s a fundamental side-effect of how these algorithms work. They have no understanding of what they’re blending together, nor even the concept of understanding anything. What they do is transform text to images via token weighting and extremely large datasets that have weights applied to all manner of tokens (read: words or symbols) as well as example images tagged by humans and yet other algorithms. Captchas help train them, for example. They effectively blend together all data that matches the tokens based on weights, but they have no comprehension. It’s an almost convincing magic trick at first glance, but everything they produce carry this flaw.

The reason text sticks out like a sore thumb to us as humans more so than most other things (perhaps barring hands with odd number of fingers etc.) is because letters are much more precise symbols that not only have to look like letters, they have to be arranged in the right sequence. There is no training data in existence that has enough examples of every kind of combination of letters and fonts in portrayed in all manner of angles and lighting etc., to effectively allow the models to blend them into convincing arrangements for any number of styles.

Sometimes they might get really close and that’ll usually be for brand names with a lot of presence in the training sets and a lot of variation, but even then it’s by happenstance. It’s not because the model understands anything.

On the topic at hand, using diffusion model-generated art in this piece is genius. Extremely fitting. Kudos.

5 Likes

I think AI, definitionally, can’t be otherwise. Wisdom is not something we’ve ever learned how to teach.

1 Like

I get what you’re saying. What I was trying to convey, but not very well, is that AI trained predominantly on information sources that reflect the output of thoughtful, experienced, reality-based humans might end up spitting out more “wisdom” than AI trained, for example, on a representative sampling of social media drivel. Of course, who is qualified to decide on the training material? There’s the rub.

1 Like

Some years ago I began substituting Homo sapiens with Ovis callidus. Most of the time it just seems a better fit.

3 Likes

If you mean WTOPIA, W-TOPIA ( A Celebration of Canna-Culture & Community ) Tickets, Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 3:00 PM | Eventbrite

I love the image of the woman holding the can of reality. Would love to have a printable pdf to make a poster.

3 Likes

Ill see if i can rez it up for you.

2 Likes

I like that. We have to be watchful. They will try to get better and we must get better at discerning their deception. Right now my friend was trying to create a book cover with AI. Maybe next time we will have to be looking closer for a “hair out of place.” :rofl:

7 Likes

As you say, the problem is the AI can be trained and programmed for desired outcomes. (Steve Kirsch has shown on various occasions how some AI immediately shuts down his inquiries on COVID and mRNA vaccines as “baseless claims” and “misinformation”).

The downstream cultural problem of pervasive AI will manifest – and indeed it’s already happening – when most human users lack the mental chops to challenge and overrule the AI. While knowledgeable people can immediately see the errors, BS, and bias in various AI outputs, most don’t, and just accept them, as we tend to accept most things out of our subject matter domains – and acceptance will be almost automatic if people are threatened with punishment, mockery, or ostracism for challenging The Authority.

During COVID, and afterwards, we’ve seen vast numbers “get with the program” because of saturation-bombing MSM propaganda and bullying. Hundreds of dazed and dulled millions have became incapable of recognizing the most obvious lies and gaslighting.

While I’d be interested in seeing an AI that pulls together all the great wisdom traditions of the world, there can almost certainly never be a 100% effective “Wisdom AI” because wisdom is the slow-growing, deeply inner product of life experience and reflection – and there are no short cuts to wisdom.

Even the greatest books can only get us so far – and even those venerable texts usually only begin to make sense for us when we have enough experience and humility to begin to hear them right. “When the student is ready, the teacher appears,” etc. (The teacher has always been there, but has merely been invisible and unheard by students with scales on their eyes and plugs in their ears.)

4 Likes

Thanks very much, and your explanation is very helpful … the AI grabs the symbols and gives them weight but have no idea what they mean.

With art anyway, i. arranging the images it seems to do a pretty good job with composition, lighting, and contrast, but sometimes it’s hilariously and ridiculously off.

I like the weirdness of the nonsense symbols; along w the dystopian dream aesthetic, they reveal what you describe as the machine’s essential dumbness.

Gustave Le Bon wrote that the most compelling and politically useful images are pure symbol—exciting, with no inherent content, and that can mean anything.

We have certainly seen that play out in the propaganda sphere. Emotionally charged images and words that can mean anything, or nothing, and rely on herd mentality to accept the desired interpretation consecrated by media wizards and repeated ad infinitum.

If we’ve learned anything these last 10 years (at least…) it’s that the human mind is pretty easily hackable with suggestion, lies, isolation, and fear — and fortified with free speech, truth, common sense, and reality-based communities.

2 Likes

Just watched this video of Daniel Schmactenberger talking at a resiliency oriented gathering. His comments are fairly brief, but quite a sobering dose of reality. I think he’s 100% correct though and really highlights the need for radical action.

*You can skip the intro to his talk unless you really want to listen. Roughly the first 7min of the video.

6 Likes

Biden said they want to end the oil and gas industries. They do not understand about the weather. During Katrina with my gas stove I was able to boil water and cook. In my gasoline auto I was able to drive to find an open grocery store, when electricity was out for several days. I am opposed to socialism, which rules the Democrats.

1 Like