Okay, I’ll take the hit, and not assume Nicole’s text had a typo. But that might help to support my argument. Perhaps the report writer made the same mistake, and that’s why that time entry says building 1.
As Cicero said, To err is human, but to persevere in error is only the act of a fool.”
I was just asking the clock time of the first shot because in the USSS-HSGAC-Interim-Report they’re stating:
At approximately 6:11:25, Crooks fired an initial volley of three shots
My analysis of the RSBN livestream, the dashcam M500-010482 and all the available videos from spectators (that I’ve time aligned) shows, the first shot was taken at 18:11:33.
It’s just mindblowing to me that they, after more than 2 month, can’t even come up with a precise time of the first shot being fired.
I’d forgive them for making mistakes like that if they had a decent system for accepting corrections, but AFAICT, they don’t want to hear from anyone. I’m afraid this is another case of “the investigation is the coverup”.
Moving.
Problem: You’re SO far behind in making available dozens of vids that you PROMISED to supply.
Problem! Reputation?
He was in Erie yesterday—inside rally at the Bayfront Center. The place was packed. What a blast! He said the rally next weekend will be a memorial for Corey. Expecting over 25,000 people.
@brian60221 @kincses-zsolt @sherlock-holmes @sorey @vegaspatriot
07:08 - Cammoshorts turns corner of AGR6
07:13-16 - What he said was ‘this is the guy who had something’…
07:19 - Cammoshorts: Hey…
07:20 - Cammoshorts: Greg…
07:21-22 - Someone 1: unintelligible Greg
07:22-23 - CammoShorts: He was with us, impossible… (then dayve interrupts)
07:24 - Dayve Stewert interruption
07:25 - Dayve Stewert interruption
07:26 - Cammoshorts: Top or down?
07:29 - Nicol: I wasn’t there (or I was in there)
07:32 - Nicol: Greg Nicol: First Burst of shooting (fence rattle) don’t/won’t stop shooting…
07:35 - Someone 2: Did you see him hit?
07:36 - Someone 3: Yeah, did that happen?
It’s on the server. When you guys can, please listen to the audio files on the subfolder Clips and let us know if you understand something different than what’s above.
https://barf.bz/files/Audio-Conversation-18%3A13-Agr6SoutheastCorner/
Please provide the WAV that you want enhanced, and I’ll send it out to give the randos on Fiverr a chance.
I’m trying to find your email so I can an account on the server
Are you talking to me?
Oh, send to slopedroof777@proton.me.
the reason why they do not modify anything is because if they would, they agreed on having made a mistake, and that undermines their authority…
I downloaded the wav for
CammoShorts: He was with us, impossible…
ran it through the free volume changer 3 times to increase the db volume 600%
upload- increase 200%- download
upload again- increase 200%- download-
upload again- increase 200%- download
Can actually here them talking now - hope this helps someone.
Or intentional deception. Who knows?
I’d like to mention “just one more thing” you probably not heard about.
Mannheim. (Or better to say Frauheim?)
There was a knife attack in Germany on a little political rally against immigration. The political activist and several other people have been injured. It was about one month after the Fico case. Police women just bystanding and watching. One police man tried to handcuff the deffending security guard, when the attacer killed that very policeman. Darwin Prize!
much of it has to do with keeping their (perceived) authority and not losing face.
whenever they admit they have to correct whatever they stated before, it will always be referred to as a precedent in the sense of “well, you said X on that date, and a bit later, you said Y, and you confirmed that X was a mistake. why would we believe that what you are saying now is true?”
I have seen cases where changes to a certain system could only be introduced until after the original authoritative decision maker had retired, as the application of the changes would have undermined that person’s authority completely!
I talked to an expert of voice recognition (several years ago).
Briefly he told me to distinguis between odd and even harmonics.
I cannot remember exactly, but one is what was said and the othe is who said. So there would be needed a special audio filter to separate odd and even harmonics.
(Mu-ha-ha. Our “best” developper said 1 is even and 2 is odd. No! The USART parity bit complements the bit stream to be odd or even. Amazing.)
Even a blind, deaf and dumb human being with a minimum IQ of 1 can understand that there were collosal mistakes made!
Now this Senate people also make a fool of themselfs, why?
better call it Mannheimistan
By the way, there are 3 audio channels of the dashcam.
that is how the system works.
if they “discover” the truth and make a report that reflects everything in great and accurate detail, it will be held against them because many of them have been involved in the evolution of that system to today’s situation…
you have seen the family trees of several police/firefighter/magistrate groups.
if they were not involved in one of the mishaps themselves, a family member may have been, and it is better to keep the worms in their can…
what we are doing here is very important, as we apply our individual expertise and insights in the matter, and most of us do not have any stake in the game, but do it well intentioned and with the honest goal of finding out what happened…
and it is this that answers the “why?” part of your question…
these three aspects makes what we do different from what they do…
