Why has the following evidence still not been published?
a photo of Trump’s ear injury.
a video taken from the stands showing the moment Trump’s ear was hit.
the bodycam footage of the security forces who arrived at Crooks first and would have had the opportunity to place casings there.
the video of the man with the red baseball cap standing next to the tree. His video should show Crooks firing all the shots.
Doug Mills has not yet released the photo showing the bullet trace in raw format. Michael Yon has claimed that a forgery could probably be detected in the raw file.
the shots could have been heard on two bodycam recordings from the parking lot area, but the soundtrack was deleted.
There is a lot of unknows, but we can work with what we know.
I’m only here because I’m skeptic of all of this.
I went from creating a model for crack boom time, to modeling the line of sight of the first fire, to geolocating all possible players and to creating the model of time of arrivals.
After all of this all is pointing to LIHOP to me.
With the info we already have they would let some evidence slip if was different.
Maybe.
The question is of there was an instigator who also supported him with information. The other assasination attempt might show up some connection. (But it also can be furter deception.)
Skip down to the section with the heading “problem is I saw it” - and then go UP about three paragraphs:
There is a witness from July 13, Dr. Joseph Meyn, an obstetrician, who says he was in front of Cory Competore (and thus presumably in the front of the left bleachers) and only about 10 feet from Mr. Trump. when shots started.
I’ll have to say no one except the professional photographers and secret service were that close, so this story is perhaps not so reliable.
Anyway, he says that shortly after Mr. Trump was shot, he heard a female secret service agent saying that Mr. Trump was hurt when he hit his head on the podium.
He says he was taken to a “witness” area and detained until after midnight. He also claims to have the shooting on video. He also says he helped take out Mr. Comperatore’s body, so he wouldn’t BE the guy who’s video from the left bleachers is on the internet already.
If this is the case, there is a valuable video out there, but the more I think about it, the more I think this is just a guy coming out of the woodwork with a story to get some attention.
The bit about being detained after midnight sounds like BS. Anyone in the stands was clearly just a bystander. Dayve Stewart and others in his vicinity were detained for an hour or two, and police actively thought Dayve might be an accomplice. All the police and secret service who worked the rally were allowed to go home at 8PM.
Holy shit! Ron Freaking Johnson is asking about a second shooter now! That makes at least three members of congress.
I don’t know if it’s been posted widely but the Hercules 2 (North) sniper team BOTH thought a bullet - at the beginning of the shots - passed very close by them, one to his left and one to his right.
I feel like an idiot for not thinking about this earlier, especially since I’ve been working on a 9/11 substack for the last 2 freaking months, but consider this screenshot from a video of a plane hitting the south tower on 9/11:
I think only one thing accounts for effects like THAT: holograms. I personally believe there were missiles concealed in those holograms, but who knows.
Hologram technology has gotten a lot better in 23 years (of course the military probably had much better technology than what was publicly available at the time), and all they had to do was project an image a little in front of a window for 20 seconds or so. Some of the weird stuff we saw in window 3 may have been problems getting the imaging right.
That might also account for an image of a reflection of a barn which extended all the way to the top of the window, seen from a a phone that was only one foot off the ground.
Grand Thumb has the definitive video about it (produced before the Trump shooting).
And Nick has recreated this with both 223 and 308 rounds and can confirm the sonic crack is not only audible from a great distance, but difficult to even tell apart on a camera phone even when the distances vary greatly.
I’d have to say this video was disappointing. How far overhead and/or to the side were the shots? Unless I missed something, I don’t think they ever said.
And it would really have been nice if they had a stereo microphone set up so you could hear the bullet approaching and then retreating. There was some sort of stereo effect, but it didn’t seem to apply to the bullets at all.
What if we were all fooled and Crooks never fired a shot? I have a feeling Chris will need to start the investigation from scratch after seeing this. But he should have looked at Trump’s ear which never showed the 2 cm wound his doctor claimed. More importantly the slope of the roof and Crooks’ position at the time of the first shot show he could NOT have fired on Trump.
For example, he claims that Crooks was on the roof for 5 minutes. In reality it was 2 minutes. It’s not difficult to figure that out, which gives the impression that he didn’t look into the assassination in detail.
That a second shooter fired from the left window of the second floor is extremely unlikely because then the sonic boom of the bullet should be audible on the videos taken from the west side of Building 6.
Overall, the information density is quite low. It could have been made into a 10-minute video.
What was interesting:
It shows a clip from Bodycam BWC2-122110, which contains the original audio track. In the Dropbox version, the audio track is completely missing at the beginning. However, there is a strong background noise, which is why hardly anything can be heard. However, the shots can be heard.
There is an excerpt about mind-control that could explain how Crooks could have been turned into a patsy.
If he was only on the roof 2 minutes instead of five that makes it even more likely Crooks was out of position and could not have taken the first shots. What do you make of the fact that no images during or after show any damage or wound to Trump’s ear? Chris never even considered this. Trump claimed blood was everywhere but photos show no blood on hand, shirt collar, hair. No medical records. Conveniently he turned his head so no videos show the supposed contact. I think we’re getting played.
Has anyone identified this weapon? Chris had no idea but surmised it might be a telescope. With a trigger and netting on it? Why? Check out the muzzle.
I looked but could find no photos showing a scar. Please post. Presumably it wouldn’t be just one photo, it would be every photo of his ear from now on. I’m not sure ear cartilage grows back. See Evander Holyfield’s ear with a chunk out of it. His doctor said the wound was 2 cm which is pretty big, 3/4 inch. In any case it would take weeks to months to heal. Trump said he was hit in the lobe and that he is a fast healer. The blood too is a problem. He said there was “blood all over the place.” Yet in photos it’s not on his hand, white shirt collar, or hair. As for Crooks, he could not have taken a shot unless he was at the top of the roof or he stood up. Why is the picture not sufficient to show at least that the first shots were not by Crooks unless he was firing into the air? The angles just aren’t there for him to get a bead on Trump.
You wisely set all shots as coming from Crooks which is the null hypothesis. However in your exploration did you discern a timing/travel difference between shots 1-3 and shots 4-8? I ask because there are two theories of a 2nd shooter: 1) From vent two which is almost directly under Crooks line of fire but is 40 ft closer; and 2) from behind Crooks.
