Audio Analysis Is Most Consistent Two Shooters At Trump Rally

Are ALL variables accounted for? Spacing, brand, age, type, condition, damage, direction, etc.?

1 Like

You are very patient.

2 Likes

I use the original Stewert video and audio, which does not depict the 3rd window immediately before or during the first 3 shots.

I’m not sure why someone thought they could move the audio and then claim it’s correct. There is no valid reason to do that.

The window is not seen on any video during the first 3 shots. And then after those shots, that window is either obscured by a curtain or that Stewert video was tampered with.

If there is a second shooter, it was from that 3rd window. It’s the only location that makes sense.

The body cam does not show that window for the first 3 shots and neither does the Stewert video. Anyone moving the original audio for the Stewert video is trolling.

Hi BigTim,

I give you an “A” for effort.

Now knowing the truth, it is so easy to debunk everybody. I just need to show these 2 simple gifs:

  1. The helper who is holding the window is moving his head. His head light is clearly seen moving

2nd-guy-in-building-6-window-3-holding-the-window

  1. You can see the smoking gun and the helpers left hand holding the window

smoking-gun and left hand from helper holding the window

I’m literally laughing at how silly this dishonest animation is. I suppose the “shooter” is firing a howitzer?

You plainly have no experience firing guns. Here’s an AR15 “smoke” from firing. Basically imperceptible. There’s no way a typical modern rifle is going to produce what you are claiming is “smoke” in 3 shots. It’s just not going to occur.
pshootfastsm

What you’re trying to pass off looks like a bad animation ghost head with long flowing hair. Was he firing a howitzer in that room?

There’s so many flaws in your belief, totally fabricated or cleverly edited and out-of-context gifs, that it’s pointless to continue to discuss it. I’ll just direct others to go review my previous plain breakdowns with time stamps and actual images to disprove every nonsensical point you’ve made…

4 Likes

I have made up my mind: The first shot came from building 6 from window 3. I don’t need to see any more.

Just one additional information, the shot you see in the gif is EXACTLY (with audio delay, depending where you are standing) the time when the first shot is heard.

I let everybody decide for them selves.

It does not line up with the original Stewert audio.

What I will say is: that appears to be happening immediately before the shots are fired. I think that’s interesting because it is what I theorized:

Removable temporary window pane gets dropped

Shots are fired

Pane returned to position

It’s like it never happened except a patsy dead on the roof.

a picture has a thousand words

2nd-guy-in-building-6-window-3-holding-the-window

:rofl:
I’m having an actual laugh attack from that howitzer smoke…

1 Like

Don’t get me wrong. If there is a second shooter, I’m Team Window 3.

I’m just saying: there is no video evidence of that window at the exact time of the shots.

At the time of the first 3 shots, Stewert has aimed his phone at the tree top/sky. And if anybody moves the audio of the Stewert video: they are trolling.

LOL. Indeed. And this animation shows the square white security tape outline of the window, still in place. And a glare, with a circular light reflection, possibly from the headlights of the police SUV parked opposite facing the south AGR wall.

Again I have showcased ALL 3 of these windows having light anomolies and reflections. In fact, the white light in this image, is a far distance away from the other circular light reflection (probably due to the camera angle and source of reflection). Both the white outline on the window, and the glare, PROVE THE WINDOW IS CLOSE AND IN PLACE.

Image of the white security tape around the window glass in the close position.

They could not be there if the window was open/removed. So again your own theory is internally inconsistent and you’re just floundering to find any still shots that might support your silly theory.

1 Like

There is no video of the window at the time of the shooting.

I downloaded the Hi-res video direct from Stewart’s YouTube site the day it was uploaded Sound tracks all good. Between 4:57 & 5:02 he focuses on window 3 most of the time as 8-9 shots ring out.

1 Like

That is not correct at all for shots 1-3. Straight up lies. I don’t care about shots 4-10.

There is no view of the window when shots 1-3 happen, not for 11 seconds and for 5 more seconds after that, it’s weird as hell.

Agreed the sound tracks, based on his reaction the instant shots 1-3 occur at about 4:55 (time on Stewart’s video). He jumps and starts panic movements. There is no other explanation that lines up other than that’s when the first volley fires.

I will note, as I did painstakingly document earlier today, there’s only a 4 second break in Stewart’s video of Window 3, and he goes back to it repeated at 5:00 and every few moments thereafter for several seconds. We have essentially an unbroken chain of custody on Window 3 sufficient to say nobody opened/closed it, nobody removed/replaced it, and nobody fired out of it for a myriad of reasons I have documented, to include there is simply insufficient time to do so and anyone doing so would have been observed by the cop, Stewart, his video, or the dozen witnesses standing there in visual distance.

Hi Bumblebeeez,

Yes, and I would like to revise my self on this topic.

Now having found the HD video from BWC2-122110, I am now aware that the helper is wearing a head lamp. So maybe I got confused between the head light and the shot in Stewarts video and there is not a 1 second delay. If so, everything matches up perfectly, because the shot seen on the body cam and the “falsely estimated” shot in Stewarts video are in two different positions. The one in the body cam seems to be the correct height of shot 1.

My hypothesis of the one second delay seems to be debunked now. But the main part is that everything matches up. The light in Stewarts video is the head light of the helper.

I am sorry that this turned out to be incorrect, but I did not know until yesterday that there was a helper in the room with a head light.

You can just watch the original Stewert video with original audio. At the time of the first 3 shots, Stewert looks at the sky, some leaves, the tree trunk, grass…

But what matters is that the window is…weird.

Stewart standing provides the odd rope glare, before and after the shooting. We see this same effect in Window 2. But those of you holding onto the window theory, refuse to acknowledge Window 2 has similar light imperfections.

Stewart kneeling low during and immediately after the shooting, creates the different window reflection artifact glare.

Window 2 rope glare 1.5 minutes after the shooting at 6:34 timestamp on Stewart’s video. You can also see Window 3 rope glare returns.

Different window 2 light reflection.

The light flashes are long after the assassin shooting, and only about 6’ high. So they are audibly not correct, and the height probably does not clear the 6’ fence line but definitely does not clear the 9’ or taller bleachers packed with spectators. So it’s obviously impossible for it to be a gunshot.
abacd460fa3d9230ce72aa50a92580b93380fba3_2_690x388

6’ tall officers for reference.

Yes, I think we agree:

Shots 1 is fired from window 3, but Stewart did not catch it on camera, but the body cam did!

:slight_smile:

1 Like