Thank you for correcting my diagram, Phase Five. On reconsideration I believe the difference in height between the connector roof and Building 6 roof is about 21". Based upon it appearing to be just above the camo officer just barely being able to step up to the upper roof and at the same time being just above his knee height. Also I recalculate the roof pitch to be about 3.25’ rise per 12’ of run. Yes, at an eye height of 21" above the connector roof he would easily be able to see a prone body towards the peak of the roof. I will try to remove my diagram and post. I do agree that it seems incredible that he could see such detail in the second or less that he had his eye high enough.
Greetings. What’s a good German site that discusses the culprits behind the Nordstream 2 bombing? Every few months articles come out in the US about culprits, it’s never the US military/CIA. But both Biden and Victoria Nuland clearly stated before the sabotage that the pipeline would not work if Russia were to invade Ukraine.
2 Likes
https://x.com/RepLuna/status/1824085008484602084
Here’s the Butler Pa shooter Thomas Crooks carrying his gun around the building in plain site! This kid did his practice shooting at the same range the Homeland Security used for their practice & other law enforcement officers used too.
He thinks he’s on assignment to help the Secret Service or the FBI. A few minutes from now when the professional shooter shoots right over his head he will be dead for his trouble!
THIS IS A DEEP STATE ASSASINATION ATTEMPT!
This was resleased to the public today by Fla Congress-person Paula Luna Thank You Paula…
1 Like
PA is an open carry state.
However, it makes zero sense not to approach an armed civilian at that AGR area.
It did fall within the assigned coverage area for the 2nd story snipers, so the fact that an armed person was allowed to walk around, for any length of time, without an immediate answer like an approach and interview, is insane.
This also questions their entire claim that Crooks wasn’t classified as a threat, only “suspicious” because he only had a range finder. When did they know Crooks walked around armed?
Did the crowd member just think he was plains clothes? They don’t normally open carry. Was it reported to anyone?
So many questions!!
2 Likes
The Canadian mining engineer and well known climate-church heretic Stephen McIntyre just pointed out that FirstNet must have been involved in the communication break down at that day in Butler (here) :
Seruga states that in wake of 9/11, FirstNet was set up as a federal agency to ensure that local responders and federal responders had coordinated communications and that Merrick Garland and Mayorkas were both on the FirstNet board. We are also told by Secret Service’s Rowe that Butler local police and secret service were not communicating with one another. So what is the point of FirstNet?
If you follow the subthread started by TonySeruga, you’ll find a post by GatewayPundit:
Local Officer Radioed About Armed Shooter on Roof 30 Seconds Before Trump Was Shot, But Message Never Reached Command Post — Internet Cell Service Was Down 25 Minutes Before Shooting
And further down MaryGraceTV recounted (with respect to Jan 6, I believe):
I was walking down PA Ave well after the breach doing a livestream and there was an invisible wall beyond which I simply had NO SERVICE. It was roughly in line with the reflecting pool. Nobody was getting any signal once they passed that line.
That implies Geofencing and this might also explain why there are so few cell-phone videos suitable for audio analysis.
Among the many board members of FirstNet shown by TonySeruga, there is also a man called Mayor Billy Hewes. I’ve a faint memory trace that Hewes also occupies a leading position within Butler City police, but I’m really unsure about it.
I don’t trust this pic at all. Why is this just coming to light now? All the videos from that day and it takes this long to come out. I don’t buy it at all.
4 Likes
I genuinely don’t know if there’s merit to the cell phone sabotage theory or not. But it seems to me we just don’t need it.
The southern snipers turned north to deal with some threat. They must have said on the radio that they were doing that. Command knew 60-90s in advance of the shooting starting that the southern snipers thought there was some imminent threat so serious that they were going to abandon their southern watch to help the norther snipers who were probably saying that they didn’t have good visibility on a critical roof.
Cellular problems didn’t cause any problem there. And cellular problems didn’t cause any problem with Nicol and Butler sniper M doing something weird in their overlook location.
In case not seen Gateway Pundit reports crooks cremated.
Burning evidence is a DS MO to close case.
3 Likes
Well, 60-90 s to decide if that person on the roof might perhaps be one of their own. But the (induced) com chaos started much earlier.
2 Likes
Yeah, they might have to take time to try to figure out who it is. But if the southern snipers thought they might have to deal with the kind of problem you need snipers to solve, then Trump should have been off the stage.
That is so true, but did the command center actually gave that order? And if so, when?
2 Likes
I know diddly squat about how they normally do things and how it should have been done. But I suspect that it actually happened in the other direction, i.e., the snipers thought they had a threat, decided amongst themselves that the southern snipers would turn to be able to deal with it, and they of course communicated that to command.
If everything was on the up and up, we would have had the radio logs or transcripts or whatever weeks ago. My thinking is that anything other than radical transparency should be taken as a confession of guilt.
4 Likes
I suspected the “van” and explosives guaranteed FBi jurisdiction.
afterthought???
Regards
K
Comm disruption is being saved for election. It would be noticeable at Rally.
You are probably right about comms.
good point.
k
1 Like
I don’t think he was walking around carrying a rifle. That’s either a shadow or photoshopped. I live in PA, and yes we’re an open-carry state, but I’ve never seen a single person (in my life) walking around carrying a long gun let alone an AR. You wouldn’t get very far without being stopped and questioned by LE. Open carry is a holstered sidearm.
As for the cell coverage, I’ve been to AGR and the Farm Show property three times, and each time I had no issues with cell signal anywhere on or around either property.
3 Likes
If that pic is pulled from this video, then it doesn’t show the rifle in the video.
4 Likes
I recommend to take at least notice of the hypothesis of the Swiss physicist Hans-Benjamin Braun here.
Albeit there were probably related forces at work wrt NorthStream, a discussion of that affair should rather not be mixed into this thread.
1 Like
Taking one frame from a video that has a shadow that may appear to some as a rifle to support your theory is deceitful. Taking snapshots of multiple frames showing the same alleged rifle would be needed to support your theory. I challenge you to do that. In the video the subject is seen swinging his right arm as he walks, and there is no rifle, so I already know you won’t be able to meet that challenge.
2 Likes
If cell service was down, how were BC-ESU sending texts and pics around?
1 Like