I am not at all convinced by your demonstration (or rather by that of ChatGPT which you blindly follow like a dog follows its master) but let’s say that it is a possibility, in my opinion very unlikely, which will allow you to get closer to your contradictions.
Another good observation. Dayve stated in the video about 2 minutes before shots started that there was someone “in” the building. That would explain why he was concentrating on showing the windows.
He’s never mentioned that he saw any muzzle flashes, and when talking to a police officer (in the audio in one of the longer videos) he said he thought the red truck guy had started shooting at them for not leaving the property.
After shots were fired (in the video) he stated that the shooter was on the roof. It’s hard to tell if he was surprised by that or not.
I have no experience seeing rifle muzzle flash from being more-or-less in front of it, so I don’t know how bright it would be.
Dayve’s X account predeceased us when I told Dayve that pictures from his video would be worn on T shirts.
His reply was a DumbAndDumber animatedGif(laughing Lloyd eating burger in diner scene).
Also, his answer describing shots “at us, for being along his fence” is in this video(un mute to hear it)
I haven’t given Collin’s arm swing full thought yet - I’ll go back and try to figure out what’s going on.
As for the ALG video - it was upload at 720 resolution. That’s 720 lines wide and 1280 high. With X, as far as I know, you either watch in the little screen or blow it up to your full screen size. Sometimes you can download it, but only sometimes.
I used my 2K monitor pivoted to get the full resolution, albeit in double size.
This is a still from the 2 second mark - 32 seconds before the first shot. It shows how that twisted electrical line - for whatever reason - sometimes looks wider just to the right of that second window.
Lastly, here’s one after a few frames after that, when the videographer starts panning and things start to get blurry. That slightly thicker section of the electrical line still shows up, but the other sections do not:
I think the section of the Stewart video and the the McCollough videos you are referencing are looking at slightly different parts of Detective Collin’s stride. He’s extending his stride in the Stewart clip and starting to bring his back foot forward in the McCollough bit.
His arm motions, or lack thereof, can be explained by the fact that he’s holding his pistol with his right hand and had finished making a call by radio with his left hand. His left hand does move in the two frames he appears in the Stewart clip.
Here are the last two frames from Dayve Stewart you have shown with Det Collins in the frame, along with the angles of his front leg and the roofline:
It’s not a big difference, but you can see that his front leg is further away from straight up and down in the second frame.
I’m certainly open to the idea any of these videos were tampered with.
With Dayve’s video, we see “Crooks” in a full frontal pose at 6:11:28, and then full profile at 6:11:31 - with the rifle extended. That doesn’t seem possible. So I’m very suspicious about that.
I’ve seen lots of weird artifacts in the center window, not only with Dayve’s video, but also with Det Collins. This is 2025. 24 years ago, someone made the twin towers TURN INTO DUST (only 1 file cabinet was found, and it was from a basement). No outsider has any idea what that weapon was to this day. I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to think there was some way that window was made to look like it was a closed window, when in actuality the glass was fully or partially removed.
It’s not impossible some other part of the front wall - yes that includes the vents - were modified to look closed when they were in fact open.
We have to keep in mind that Trump didn’t plan this rally until a week and a half in advance, so any modifications would have to be done fairly quickly.
That’s the spirit!
You can start printing T Shirts, and maybe give any ‘royalties’ to Dayve.
…and I’m also working on very pixelated bald man images from Driscoll.
I thought I saw a very strange anomaly in Det. Collins’ bodycam video today, but it turns out that it was just a balloon falling down in front of him.
Here’s the frame where it originally appears (6:10:15 last frame) with positions of where it goes in following frames.
The blasted thing sure looks like a cloud, but it’s probably only a couple feet in front of Collins and moving fast at first. I wonder if one of the young people that are walking in front of Dayve right about that time chucked it over Collins’ head.
In the 7:34 video I have, I see Crooks in maybe 4 frames, total.
I see Yearick, Baldy, and OTHERS, in hundreds of frames.
So did Danno and $Cash plant all those extra people?
Here’s one of Crooks(maybe with a rifle):
Oh shit…
Am I imagining this or is “Crooks” head too small? His head isn’t more than 105% to 110% of the distance to Dayve than the crest of the roof. Accordingly, it should only appear to be 5 or 10% smaller.
And yet, I get 15 or 16 pixels measuring the top of his head to his chin vs 55 pixels of lane width at the top of the roof. The width of his head is 11 or 12 pixels. Judging from the following pic, his head height should be about 1/3 of the lane width.
I cannot test that, I have no guns. But many cameras can see infrared.
It is not just a beam, it is a digital code which instructs the aircondition unit. So if we look at still frames, probably we can decode that message.
Frame Rate: You mentioned 30 fps. This is a relatively low frame rate for capturing IR signals that could be modulated at frequencies of 30–60 kHz. At 30 fps, the camera would likely miss some of the individual flashes of the LED because:
If the modulation frequency exceeds the camera’s frame rate, you’d get aliasing, where the signal may appear as just a dim glow or pulsed light rather than a distinct pattern.
If the modulation is 38 kHz, a camera operating at 30 fps wouldn’t reliably capture every modulation cycle, and the information might appear as noise or a faint blur.
okay, the remote control is much faster. forget it.
downloader page:
** https://twittervideodownloader.com/
First click on original video, copy the address. Paste into downloader page. You will be verified being human.
Cheap cameras have no infrared filters. I had a Sony camcorder with nigth vision mode - but that is grayscale (no colors, only intensity).
You can try your phone with a remote control.
Probably you can ask Dayve to do so too.
Maybe it was exclusively sold to a broadcasting company who never will broadcast it. Only if congressional taskforce issues a subpoena, but it is over.
I would have a hard time contradicting your findings if we only had Steward’s video, but fortunately we also have McCollough’s video to compare with. At the exact moment when the right foot transitions from “heel strike” to “foot flat” (boot making contact with the grass), we can clearly see the differences.
Since both videos were recorded at the same frame rate, it would be impossible for the boot to remain stuck in heel strike in Steward’s video without ever sinking into the grass.
What makes the issue even more obvious is that in McCollough’s video, Detective Collins is clearly swinging his arm, not talking on the radio. Yet in the last four frames of Steward’s video, there is absolutely no sign of arm movement.
Personally, I believe that the fact Steward suddenly swings the camera to the left at that most critical moment—just seconds before the shots—strongly suggests that the following frames needed to be covered up. The three frames in question appear almost too perfect to be realistic: there is absolutely no blur on the walls, and a clear view of Crooks on the roof. As you also pointed out, Crooks’ head size looks incorrect. I believe if we analyze this in more detail, we’ll find further inconsistencies.
Another important point: when comparing with McCollough’s video, the first shot in Steward’s video appears to be delayed by approximately 0.8 seconds. That’s a significant discrepancy, especially given that we are analyzing the footage frame by frame.
May I ask @kincses-zsolt, who is specialized in this type of work, to apply the same synchronization method we used to confirm shot 3 from vent1—aligning the steps in McCollough’s and Steward’s videos? My own analysis shows about a 0.8 second delay in Steward’s video. I have also taken the audio delay into consideration.
You believe the first shot comes out of the window, while I believe—thanks to the video you shared—that it originates just next to the window.
We’ve uncovered a great deal of new evidence in the past weeks, and we are circling in. The more evidence we gather, the easier it becomes to find even more.