The official story is that Murcko got to a south facing window in the 2 story AGR building JUST IN TIME to see Crooks get fatally shot, then radioed that the shooter was down.
My first thought when Roger mentioned the inconsistency was that it is a big problem for the official narrative. It may not be. Murcko may have put it out on his local radio - don’t know if he was on ops 3, ops 4 or both. The game of “telephone” would be working much faster once they weren’t trying to slow things down, so either the one local-secret service team or the one PSP guy in the security room could have gotten it forwarded to the USSS guys on stages within 5 or 10 seconds.
But I’d like to see the detail of how that went through.
@daniel59 has provided firsthand video evidence indicating that the third shot struck the hydraulic cylinder.
Given this, which account do you consider to be accurate? A single bullet cannot simultaneously be lodged in Mr. Copenhaver’s abdomen and have penetrated the hydraulic pipe.
“Firsthand video evidence”? Was daniel59 at the JCB telehandler recording 376 days ago?
Did you watch the closeup of Copenhaver’s shirt, bulging with ‘fluid’ spraying ‘north’ into his shirt at 18:11:35 EDT 13 July(2024)?
Elon warned that image was graphic content and, in this case, I agree with Elon.
The graphic content wasn’t a “startle reaction” by Copenhaver’s stomach.
His shirt also wasn’t “startled”…it just was soaked with fluid…some blood at the top of the wet area…
I’m claiming, as fact, that the bullet you call “Shot 3” is wedged against Copenhaver’s spine, and that’s why it can’t be removed.
And can you see Copenhaver’s shirt being soaked?
I didn’t do ANY photo editing, except resizing, with Irfanview, and a yellow arrow pointing at the wet spot.
Multiple videos clearly show that the third shot struck the hydraulic cylinder, which would make it physically impossible for that same bullet to be lodged in Mr. Copenhaver’s spine.
Are you suggesting, then, that all of this video evidence has been fabricated?
Do you have videos at google drive or dropbox, “clearly showing” any bullet hitting the JCB fluid?
Please post links to the files…not just youtube or rumble videos.
And you didn’t answer my question:
do you see the unedited fluid spraying into Copenhaver’s white shirt at 18:11:35 EDT 13 July 2024?
Why not.
The 5.56x45mm NATO bullet that equips the AR15 has a diameter of 5.7mm. The hole is 0.3" according to you, or 7.6mm. I’m no expert, but I think the hole diameter must be larger than the bullet diameter. On the other hand, a .308 NATO bullet has a diameter 7.8mm larger than the hole diameter: how could it have entered?
Distraction and intentional contamination is very possible.
Dunno, I was never shot. However, I was once hit by a car, and I called the ambulance for the car driver (since he had worse conditions).
You can hear they say three times: “Shooter’s down”.
By the way, Comeratore used his phone in landscape.
I found a video where Copenhaver was filming. But unfortunately he finished before the shooting. (Now I cannot search for “Part 1” posts. Maybe local issue with my browser.)
The other video is the latest release from Comparatores — which you certainly have access to. As I’ve already pointed out:
0.2 seconds after shot 3, the speakers begin to fall — proving that the hydraulic cylinder, which acts as a counterweight, was compromised by the shot.
Be careful.
This world is mostly chaotic. It means, however, being fully deterministic. Just the Laplace daemon cannot measure and calculate infinitesimal precision. So a little change of almost any parameter might cause tremendeous change in many outcomes.
And why did Copenhaver and yet another person immediatelly to the railimg corner shot?
It is some trick. Remeber it is deception. And don’t forget it is deception.
According to the ANSI B4.2 standard, an LC3 (Locational Clearance Fit) would only require a tolerance of +0.0005 to +0.0012 inches for a 5.7 mm bullet to pass through a hole.
I did not personally measure the 0.3-inch impact, but since you’re challenging it, I will make a special effort to reverify that measurement and get back to you. This is critical evidence that has only recently come to light and appears to have been withheld from us until now.
Your ‘evidence’ is from so far Southwest that you could have chosen a phone from a driver in Pittsburgh…or maybe Arkansas.
I’ll claim, from what I’ve seen, that Shot2 exited Dutch’s right side and hit the JCB fluid tank.
Shots 1 and 3 aren’t debatable:
Shot 1 grazed DJT’s ear and Copenhaver’s arm.
Shot 3 is nestled against Copenhaver’s spine.
Copenhaver didn’t immediately react to the railing shot.
From a 30 frame/second video, I think it’s at least 7 or 8 frames before his fingers curl(which was the first clue that his arm was starting to flip up, reflexively:
As previously mentioned, the entire upper row was startled by Shot 1, instinctively pulling back their arms — a natural first reaction when gunfire is heard. No one was injured except for Trump, and TOB was extremely fortunate not to be hit, as the bullet passed between his right waist and right arm before striking the upper bleachers railing.
Don’t be ridiculous or, as SonjaX6 has advised, “please stop trolling us…”
Watch this 1 frame per second slideshow
from a 30 frame/second video:
(each frame is 1/30 second)
the shot is ON the rail
and OFF the rail,
at least 8 frames before Copenhaver’s arm begins its naturally reflexive reaction:
