“Please watch the videos Chris has been doing. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that Crooks is the shooter, like photos of him aiming a rifle, shell casings around his body, being in almost exactly the spot we would expect him to be in based on where the rounds hit, his distance roughly matching the audio data, etc. That’s what we have, since the FBI stole the vast majority of the direct evidence.” Direct quote from Brian.
Pitiful because not even close to Factual and Brian you want to lecture me about this Forum. Next time have Facts or logical conclusions. Otherwise, I too will ignore like others that try to gaslight me.
And thanks for trying to insult my intelligence. I have watched ALL of Chris’s videos multiple times except the LAST ONE. That was NUTS from the beginning, so I couldn’t get past the first few minutes.
This dude Peter believes that after 5 some days, Cheatle makes her first appearance with a media friendly network to the regime to tells us the Truth.
That think tanks, focus groups and assorted mouthpieces, didn’t come up with the slopey roof. That Cheatle though never signing off on the final SS security plans for a Trump rally didn’t have snipers on the roof, because she was genuinely concerned for their safety. Can’t make this stuff up.
As Peter begins with some on the Left are mentally ill, while some on the Right are stupid.
So the rest of what you said, Brian was well you remind me of Peter.
Nothing you said is even close to the truth in verifing that Crooks was the shooter nor resembles Chris’s position on this shooting.
I suggest you go back and watch all the videos. He only had issue of where to place the 2nd shooter. No one knows the exact trajectories of all the bullets.
And as far as the “boring bodycam” be useful. Sure…lol…the audio was edited like who knows what else, but all the times the cam lens is blocked wasn’t cut, which was a lot of it.
Adios.
