Cullen is a nutter. He had 3 different shooters firing blackout rounds at Trump. The reasons, as you might imagine, were extremely tenuous. While he may have interesting ideas, like any madman, I’m currently discounting all of his conclusions without consideration.
Speaking of going nuts:
I’d say we have 3 very different levels:
The Earth not being flat is personally verifiable with minimal work in a variety of ways.
The exploding microphone idea is absurd on the basis of the evidence we all currently agree upon, even the exploding microphone people.
The moon landing hoax people reject the bulk of the evidence you would use to prove it. Any meaningful verification would require a telescope measuring hundreds of metres across.
These aren’t just quantitative differences; they are qualitative differences in our Cartesian Crisis.
From the life is driving video, I measure about 69 ms from the first pressure peak of the crack to the first major (negative) pressure peak of the boom.
I’ve asked Aaron if this is possible and he has responded that it’s not. I did that on another thread, so just letting folks who ‘like’ this post to know.
Chris’s video is making the rounds on other podcasts. Larry Johnson referenced it on the Daniel Davis / Deep Dive. about an hour ago today.
One possibility brought up, is a frangible bullet from a 300 Blackout. But then the Med team has to be in on the coverup. But looking at the JFK assassination that is not impossible.
Another thing Larry said was, Robinson’s defense attorney should play Chris’s video to the jury and create reasonable doubt.
Dont forget there is a second option for silencing patsies if killing them is adjudged to be just toooo obvious … even in this era of ‘what are you going to do about it’?
That option is to avoid a trial by having the patsy plead guilty, possibly in response to a plea deal or threats to people he cares about. This was how the forensic evidence from Port Arthur was protected from scrutiny.
In Candace Owen’s “Who Betrayed Charlie Kirk?” | Ep 245 (18:00 - 18:30), two persons on the balcony of the building (in the general area you surmise the bullet came from) answer the person filming…saying they heard a shot from “over here.”
Hello Chris,
Ive watched both episodes. There is much you discussed that I agree with you on, and some that I have low to medium confidence.
I have followed John Solomon for quite some time because he is always first on breaking stories. His investigative journalism is phenomenal in my opinion.
The day after the Kirk shooting he reported that he was told by ‘federal law enforcement’ that they were investigating the possibility that Charlie may have worn a vest, and (in their words) the bullet may have ‘ricocheted’ off the vest and into his throat. I will attach the link below.
I know you ruled it out by saying "Erika and TPUSA both said he wasnt. I was able to capture a screen grab that leads me to believe it is possible. (I dont know how to post a photo here)
Now having said that, I want to address why I think its possible. (besides the screen grab) Your explanation about the “cavitation event” seens very plausible. But before I heard your explanation, I thought of John Solomon’s report about the vest. I viewed the impact from every angle possible. In slow motion and frame by frame. To my eye I saw what you claimed was the cavitation event. But it seemed to me, what appeared to be cavitation, was the initial impact or the kinematic response" or “percussive reaction” to his chest making his shirt lift a fraction of a second before you see the entrance wound, which made me think the bullet did hit some sort of vest (which caused the vest to look like the cavitaion). It must be the footage you used but slowed down considerably. This is my unprofessional opinion. It’s what my eyes saw.
This is the report by John Solomon
Can you source the information when Erika and TPUSA state he wasn’t wearing a vest.
I ruled out a bullet proof vest because of the clear pictures we have of his t-shirt stretched across both his front and his back which did not show anything else beneath the shirt.
Such plates are not light. They have to be held in place. A compression t-shirt at a minimum, but if I were on his security team, it would be a full level III+ system capable of stopping a rifle round, requiring a vest of some sort.
Here’s the deal. A titanium plate alone is not rated to stop ANY rifle rounds:
Okay, so maybe it will stop something, now and then for magical reasons. I’ll grant that. But nothing ever will simply stop a high-speed rifle round by deflecting it cleanly. “PING! PEW!”
If it could deflect it cleanly, then it has to be a jacketed (“ball” or FMJ) round, in which case it’s going to carry on straight through his neck as cleanly as if the neck weren’t even there.
To be more certain of stopping or deflecting a .30-6 round, you’d need the complete system as seen here:
The ‘Magic’ bullet “Commission Exhibit 399” (CE 399), was found on a stretcher in Parkland Memorial Hospital. This stretcher was the one used to carry Texas Governor John Connally, who was also wounded in the shooting.
Not in a couch.
This clip says bullet went through c2-c6 vertebra than stopped near his T1… Which doesn’t make sense with the wound we saw on video…the wound on the video is lower than c2
If he has paid attorneys I’m sure they will do something to that effect, having been in the courts as an addict for many years in Utah County, I don’t recognize his attorneys; I used to know all the public defenders by sight.
But, they still could be🤷🏼♂️, he might be screwed. There was only ONE Public Defender I knew of who was just as good as a paid one… Debbie Hill!
