One photo when he was carried to the vehicle look at what the arrows point to. It appears to be something on his chest and straps hanging.
The other photo the arrow is pointing to something that appeared to be under his tee shirt at time of impact.
First, we can only āassumeā that statement comes from the medical examiner.
Secondly, he doesnāt say it hit C2 first. He just states which vertebrae were damaged. It could have hit C6 first, and the cavitation caused the others to be damaged. This is the reason its important to only take first hand information like when we can hear it explained by the medical examiner directly with an opportunity to ask questions. Obviously, that will only happen at trial.
1 Like
I only watched about the first two minutes of your video. At which point I had to stop it because you were saying there was an entrance wound and an exit wound. Right there youre incorrect and no reason to watch any futher.
1 Like
I guess you should have watched the rest of it then.
Why? Your hypothesis is completely wrong if you think there was an entrance wound on his right side and exited from his throat on his left side. Its obviously wrong.
1 Like
LOL re-read my post. I said nothing about the entry or exit, I said the mic cable was a factor which it was.
He doesnāt specifically say damagedā¦he said ācrashed throughāā¦so I guess that could mean just damaged or it could mean went through the vertebra
Better check your sources.
Charlie Kirk was wearing a wireless lavalier microphone. The microphone clipped to his shirt was connected wirelessly to a transmitter pack.
1 Like
I was paraphrasing. I just meant the cavitation must have just blown his neck apart. I heard somewhere it was like a decapitation.
The video I posted for Chris to review was created 15 days ago, 10 days after Charlie was shot. Discrepancies and things hard to square up with a critical mind were surfacing. Theories were abound, a lot of them were ridiculous and already reasonably determined to be unfounded. Chris posted his first video 7 days after the video I posted was made. Since Chris didnāt mention in his first video any sign of a mic cable (or jewelry chain) and the cable or chain was moving violently under the shirt, pressing outward against it from the inside and even popping up and out the back of his neck (looking like an ear piece flying backward from his ear with a cable attached) I decided to post it for Chris to evaluate since it was all related to his cavitation theory which Chris solidly demonstrated and I agree with as being the primary cause of the shirtās inflating motion.
The cable/jewelry chain influence on the shirt still needed to be evaluated at that time to rule it out as being a major influencing cause of the shirts violent movement. Why? Because if it were a major influence, it could then allow the entertaining of a lower velocity round NOT capable of such extreme cavitation. Why does that matter? That opens the door to many other weapon choices and associated velocities, shooting angles and the possibility of more realistic deflections that would make more sense to be void of an exit wound, instead of miracle necks. Itās very hard to believe the official narrative thus far, Iām sure you agree, so I sent the video to Chris to review it with a comment about the mic cable moving the shirt violently. You missed that whole story and its implications since you didnāt watch the video or remember while watching it the reason why I posted it in the first place. It had nothing to do with an exit wound in his neck and that theory was completely irrelevant to the reason I posted it, as you have now learned since youāve probably bothered to take 2 minutes to read this.
You last commented to me that it turns out Charlie had a wireless mic and to check my sources. As I originally posted when I uploaded the video, my single āsourceā was the video I posted 14 days ago. You have to admit the content creator did accurately see a cable (a jewelry chain perhaps, as Chris theorizes in his last video) violently influence Charlieās shirt from underneath while also popping out the back of his neck, appearing to be coming from behind his ear? At supersonic speed influencing the chain or cable movement, the video is guaranteed to be quite blurry and incomplete. That was the essence of my original post when uploading the video. So my source is corroborated that something under his shirt violently moved it outward and popped out the back of his neck, looking like a mic/ear piece cable following the same location as a mic wire would travel to an ear piece (around the front of his chest from the mic up to his neck and around the back of it, to his ear, where you see something appear to come flying off his ear after he was shot) which is also how a chain wraps around your neck and hangs along your chest in the front. Seems to me like two weeks ago my source made an accurate observation and it was worth posting to be evaluated and ruled in or out. A good detective has patience more than anything and runs down all the leads until they are either corroborated or unfounded. In the process new information may be discovered and change the outcome. Stay thirsty my friend.
It was more likely his jewelry chain with his cross than a mic cord/wire.
I know it been said he wasnt weating a vest. But in my opinion that needs to be investigated more. It still seems to me, when the fron view of that video, that there is an initial impact which causes his shirt to move, then bullet hole becomes visible. I certainly understand cavitation, but review it in very slow motion, I believe you will see what I mean. Cavitation still probably occurred but after the bullet entered. I will post two photos that still make me think he might hage been wearing some sort of vest. One photo is when he was carried to the SUV. It appears his shirt wss removed (maybe to use to stop bleeding) but look at arrows. He was wearing somthin with straps hanging down. The other photo was on impact, something appears to be from āunderā his shirt, again look at arrow. Remain thirsty!
1 Like
Interesting pics and I know exactly what you mean by the shirt seeming like it got hit (or for whatever reason definitely seemed to react first). Thatās what I thought too when I saw the first video the day it happened, I told my friend it looked like he was shot in the upper chest for the same reason you said. Maybe itās just supersonic turbulence of the round passing his shirt right as heās about to be hit being captured by 30-60 frame rate cameras, I donāt know enough about it to speak from any kind of experience.
The pic with the arrows pointing to the straps is really interesting. On one hand when Charlie was speaking it really didnāt look like he had any kind of traditional vest on, thatās for sure. If that were true then maybe the straps were the result of a fabricated gurney they made to carry him out. But if he was wearing a vest, maybe it was homemade and in a ātube topā fashion (no shoulder straps to hold it up) and wrapped under his shoulder blades with a plate shoved in between his skin and the material? I just canāt see any sign of it along his back when heās bending forward and talking, so it would have to be really thin like a strong pantyhose so his skin remained sheer?
It would be nice if TurningPoint would release some video from the rear but maybe they donāt want to have the HD version of him being assassinated from 5 feet away, forever to be seen by his kids and wife which I can understand, too. I wonder if someday a smoking gun video will emerge and shed new light on all this. Cheers!
Chris, THANK YOU!
I was trying to avoid the entire mess, and grieved for Charlie (someone I never met), and felt overt hostility towards Candice. But your research and presented evidence now gives me hope for revealing the dark sinister individuals and forces that committed such an EVIL act!! Thank you Chris
1 Like
It was my first thought when I first saw it the day it happened. Then the next day I saw this post of Real Americaās Voice of John Solomon, who said this (see the post) I believe John Solomon is a really great investigative journalist.
So it made sense to me and I did as much research on vests and all. While reseaching I learned about kinematic response" or āpercussive reactionā of his body which is the reaction of the initial impact which I felt like the bullet first struck his chect just below his left collar bone and some how deflected, ricocheted, spalled, whatever may be the proper term, and then into his neck. Also maybe why the entrance wound appeared to be larger than a normal entrance wound. I just know it was obvious the shot came from infront of his body.
Maybe something like this, or what you suggested
Candace Owen said she saw the 4k footage from the rear camera and said it wasnāt gory and no exit wound. There was another TPUSA 4K camera in front and to Charlieās left that will have amazing footage, Iām sure the FBI/Medical examiner haved analysed it already.
Looks to me like the āSmoke/Vaporā was in front of his shirt.
1 Like
If you are insinuating its from the microphone on his shirt, thereās not much I will say other than no.
First off, if you were here when this thread actually started OR if you actually went through and read the comments in the thread, you would know that i DONT agree with the Exploding Mic theory. Instead you āInsinuateā that I āInsinuatedā when I was talking about something else entirely.
Clearly we can see something that looks like vapor cavitation(which wouldnāt happen with a tiny explosive); some people think itās coming from under his shirt but I said it looks like itās in front, we just canāt see fully with a white T-shirt background.
But when you start commenting on what people say, before knowing whatās been said, youāre just wasting your time while inflating your ego.
2 Likes
There is nothing to inflate my ego about. Iāve been commenting on this thread from Chriās original post. Iām not reading every single word of every comment. But I will respond to comments made to me, which is what I did with you. And, if you read my comment properly, it said āIf you are insinuating,ā which is not saying you did. But if you are, no, I dont agree. I also dont agree that the photo I posted is showing any vapor or smoke either inside or outside his shirt. The cavitation effect and bullet path occur inside the body and do not create vapor or smoke outside the body.
Hope I made myself clear.
1 Like
It actually can exit the hole it makes. Iāve seen videos of the same caliber hitting ballistics gel, Chris even showed some. And thatās honestly why I think heās onto something here with the bullet path and it hitting his bone. If there wasnāt an exit wound in the back because it hit bone, some cavitation vapor would have to eventually go somewhere after fatally expanding his neck. If it didnāt hit bone, that bullet would have went straight through, along with vapor from the exit wound.
And sure, I commented on your photo but I donāt think I said it in a way that would warrant a patronizing, smug responseā¦ at least thatās how it sounded to me. If you werenāt, cool 
, I apologize!