No, I wasnt being smug at all. I’m careful how I word my comments. Now, "If you are saying the bullet can exit the same entrance wound, I’d have to strongly disagree in this instance. It has already been reported that the bullet entered his neck (the entrance wound we see) destroyed C1-C7 vertebrae and lodged in the T1 just below the skin. I am still waiting for the official statement that he wasn’t wearing any vest of any type as that’s what was reported the day after, by John Solomon, but never confirmed or denied “officially.” See clip.
Personally, what I see under his shirt (in that photo I posted) can possibly be some type of vest. I completely understand the cavitaion theory. But if you watch the video from the front, in slow motion, frame by frame, his shirt is moved, lifted, shifted, how ever you want to describe it, “before” you see the entrance wound". And then the cavitation continues.
But initial impact moves his shirt (kinematic response or percussive reaction). This is my opinion of what I see with my eyes.
There was a fairly close front view video of the hit that was taken of the web quickly. I only saw it once. I recall no initial mass ejection as one would expect with an entry wound. But fairly quickly there was a great deal of blood erupting from the wound.
Is there a simple link (not on youtube) so I can see that vid again. I think it would be good to have that link in this discussion. Maybe it is here and I just did not see it.
Thanks.
If you could “delete” the current Robinson gun evidence to make it more explainable how would you change it? Is there a lower power rifle that would have created the “correct” entrance wound, cavitation event, other impact physics, etc. at the 10 degree angle?
Not to turn this conversation into a Hollywood criminal mastermind plot… but what if the Mauser was not actually used for the assassination? Instead, what if the rooftop shooter used a totally different gun?
Why would someone do this? Because the prosecution would be frustrated once the forensics were performed. The defense could convincingly argue to a jury that Robinson could not have been the shooter since the recovered bullet was not 30-06. If the prosecution decided to do the unthinkable and suppress the exculpatory evidence the defense could still argue, with the help of expert witnesses, that the ballistic evidence is inconsistent with a 30-06 round. This ballistic theory is already endorsed by a majority of the internet. Remember, it only takes one juror to disagree with the prosecution under the Sixth Amendment.
This would take a sick amount of premeditation but what if the rooftop shooter essentially left “bait” for Utah and federal police? A fully assembled rifle & LGBTQ/antifascist/furry engravings. Utah and the trump FBI would have every incentive to give the public too much information too quickly. “We know who it was [one of our political enemies], we know how they did it, and we know why they did it.” Bait, bait, bait.
There’s more to this theory but I’ll leave it there for now. I’m not saying I endorse this. But I think we all agree this 30-06 business is hard to explain “inside the box.”
This video from Candace Owen’s reinforces the potential motive for murder behind Netanyahu/Israel with involvement of TPUSA members. Specifically it is proof of what Candace Owens has been saying that Charlie Kirk had turned against his donors and Israel because of bullying which was denied by TPUSA. Candace Owen’s named
Ian Carrol reveals 2025 FARA filing detailing Israel’s targeted campaign to propagandise hundreds of churches, Christian colleges and conservatives with pro Israel material. Further reinforces links between TPUSA and Israel.
All more the reason we will have to wait to hear/see what the medical examiners autopsy report says. Also what ballistics experts report about bullet and weapon. Speculation wont provide facts.
Very kind of you to find and post the video. By thoughtful decision, I do not have a Google account and thus cannot login to see the video. Still thanks.
I am not saying that a campaign to propagandise Christian Republicans provides motive for Charlie’s murder. Rather I’m asking the broader question much as Candace Owen’s has, about whether there was involvement of TPUSA, the FBI, the CIA and/or Mossad.
That TPUSA was established by Zionists is not disputed. There are reasonable questions as to what involvement TPUSA and US agencies had in Charlie’s murder and to what extent they are infiltrated by Israel.
None of this pertains to evidence itself of the shooting, but the vacuum of information from authorities is troubling as they could have easily quelled dissenting opinions about the murder if one or more of the three letter agencies were not involved. They have not.
The following together with Ian Carrol’s presentation above suggests Israel and Netanyahu have propagandised the US in a targeted way to justify morally bankrupt and unjustifiable actions in the Middle East.
There is no proof of course but Netanyahu saving face for his 7 simultaneous wars including the Gaza genocide appears an obvious motive for Charlie’s murder and nothing else quite comes close. Israel is desperate to keep the US supporting its expansionist military campaign because without US support, it would fail.
I understand, but most is pure speculation. And remember, there is an “alledged” shooter in custody because he didn’t kill himself with a self-inflicted gun shot.
There is a lot of evidence yet presented. At this point I’m more interested in the physical evidence, mosty the medical examiners autopsy report as well as forensic ballistics report. Then I’ll start putting together who may be responsible for shooting Charlie.
Then we will have to wait to see if there is a trial and only then will we possibly be able to establish motive, of who ever made have had motive. IMHO
Yes it is speculation. Yet keeping up the heat is the best way for more information to come forward. A false flag attack to distract the public from Charlie’s murder is of obvious concern.
With his reputation in tatters, Netanyahu is desperate and the intensity of Israeli infiltration and control of the US is backfiring whether or not he was involved. Many people assume he was involved regardless of the official narrative.
Netanyahu himself is an existential threat to Israel and that is a dangerous state of affairs because he will do anything to stay in power. There needs to be so much more information released by the FBI and the delay does not inspire confidence in the trustworthiness of the government.
Now we’re in complete disagreement. You’re fixiated on Netanyahu’s involvement and you’re saying the government should release more information. Now thats just completely irrational. The government cant release anymore information in an ongoing investigation and a possible trial. The only information they will release has been released for the charging document.
Sorry, but heres where we disagree.
What the FBI can and can’t release is unclear, but has the government ever said it can’t release information? They should at least be clear about why information has been withheld eg autopsy results. Their case against Robinson is not looking good.
I don’t know if Netanyahu is involved of not, but I do know he is in a desperate position and that can give rise to extreme behaviour. On the basis of “who stood to benefit” from Charlie’s murder, Israel is high on the list of a number of groups.
For all practical purposes, in a case like this, the FBI and government are one. In as far as the autopsy being released, its not ‘public information’ specially in an ongoing criminal investigation, you should know that, I’m surprised. Only until presented at trial will we see anything to do with the medical examiners autopsy report or any ballistics reports.
