Well, in Daniel’s world propellant gases, gas tubes and physics are not important, because the wizard in the aluminum hat made it happen, the same wizard that rigged rails and rigged a trigger to a remote controlled rifle. However, do notice that after he was entertained and had a magical blank to grab onto he now even admits to seeing a case being ejected. How curious…
I’ve droned all of the rooftops on AGR and building 6 does have some funky black marks on the ridge cap that none of the other rooftops have, but I think it’s probably attributed to something less nefarious. They’re clear on my drone footage but I don’t know how to pull a screenshot from it so I take a picture with my cell phone which kills the resolution. The other rooftops have the black marks down by the gutters.
I’m pretty convinced this is solved and “Sniper Greg” (as you call him) needs to be hauled in and waterboarded before he mysteriously dies in some unorthodox fashion.
There’s the guy in the tan shorts and white hat pointing out Crooks to LE (multiple times). This is the same guy that many claim to be an operative on the scene to confuse everyone. One by one the rabbit holes keep getting filled.
Given that the sludges appear on Google Earth’s images from previous years, I have to agree. But it’s such an incredible coincidence that I just had to mention it. Just made quick trajectories… Would it be reasonable to assume Crooks himself used Google Earth or Google Maps to check this site? Why not shoot from, say, Sludge 1, better protected from both Hercules CS teams? Ok, he had already had an encounter with Officer BoostMeUp and could be nervous, but he still had time to choose, no? Or, his LOS from sludge 1 to target was blocked by the crane? Then he goes for sludge 2, shoots 8, then gets hit by 9 and moves to his final position where he is hit on shot 10.
Not to mention that sludge 3 happens to appear to be the line of sight limit from inside of SniperGreg’s window. We never talk about that AC duct that runs vertically and obstructs the view. And, does it obstruct the view enough from inside the window to the point of being reasonable that someone inside that room would not have seen Crooks without sticking their heads out the window? And isn’t also a big coincidence that the LOS appears to match sludge 3? Would it be a limit to Crooks?, as in, do not cross this sludge smudge?
Am I seeing things because I have 3D buildings enabled?
Well, the sludges do appear on google earth’s flat images from previous years, since 2019. However, the AC units just outside SniperGreg’s nest are nowhere to be seen on the most recent flat image from 2023. So… what’s going on with these images? AC has left the building…
works out to about 0.8 milliseconds PER FOOT of distance from the recording microphone to the nearest point the bullet passes to it.
So in those cases where we do hear the bullet passing by a microphone, and the bullet is a fair distance away, that will be a significant factor. We don’t have very many shot/source combinations like that, though.
It doesn’t seem to be scratches. It seems to be clear silicone gooped there from other pictures/video. Someone else mentioned that they may apply the silicone to roof seams.
There are other locations spaced out on the roof that have similar silicone goopiness.
Hi Sonjax6,
I’m curious about your 2670 fps at the muzzle. It seems a bit low to me. When I go to the range I use 3239 fps (995 m/s) for 55 grains (manufacturer info) on ballistics tables and have no problem hitting targets. A few weeks ago I uploaded a ballistic table for 55 and 62 grains (which is slower). For 55 grains, the most common type, 3239 at the muzzle and at 155 yards the ballistic table calculated 2718fps. 2734 fps at 150 yards. That gives us around 85% of initial velocity, aprox.
Can you check the fences at eastern and soutern side please?
The problem is what GN said, the man with back pack walked toward Sheetz. But he cannot arrived from south/west area I guess, on Google Maps there are fences.
(But he was without back pack at the water tower.)
hi @greg_n and @SonjaX6.
The formula I deduced is for constant speed (eq. 12). but it derived from the more complex formula that has the solution with constant deacceleration (Eq.08). I tested the constant speed using medium velocity and the results are pretty similar to constant deacceleration. Here is an example closer to reality, modeling deacceleration with aerodynamic drag using the constant speed formula validating at Trump microphone.
disclaimer: the deacceleration is not constant, because the drag is proportional to the velocity squared and because the drag coefficient increases a little depended from Mach number. The correct solution is a logarithmic decrease in speed, but that takes more time to implement a formulation.
hi @howdoiknowthisinfo . I will explain the basics of Crooks, Trump, David and James geolocation. Using the 11/05/2021 image and correcting for Crooks apparent position his real location is:
Crooks: 586767.73 m E; 4523529.40 m N
As you can see the barns does not match here because I used the closest objects for matching like the light poles and the small white tent on upper right. For James and David position I used 2 footages to triangulate their positions. The cameras lines of sight are the red lines.
Since we are defining these locations relative to an image, here is the image location and rotation: 40.857281°;-79.970450° to 40.856740°;-79.971410° rotation -24.0520
Here is the image link:
Disclaimers: the Mercator geolocation of the position are achieved positioning the placemarks with decimal degrees and saving the placemarks. After I change to Mercator and copy the geolocation results without saving. This way the location bug does not truncate the geolocation.
The height is a whole other model. If we can’t agree on the geolocation then the height is irrelevant.
here is my location references.
Perhaps your been affected by the Mercator bug since a lot of your locations have truncaded geolocations or using a different satellite image and different podium image. I explained these issues here.
I’m confused, @vt1. You say that Vm is the muzzle speed, but 2750 ft/s is the average velocity. The muzzle velocity must be much higher, like around 2900 or 3000, to achieve that average.
There are no fences on the eastern side of AGR except for the fencing around the water tower. The water tower entrance (drive) is coned off to deter vehicle traffic.
There are two fences on the south side between building 6 and where the rally was held on the farm show property. Both run the entire length of the property (east to west) from Evans City Road (main entrance) to Meridian Road (water tower entrance).
The orange stake is where Trump’s podium was erected. You can see the first fence in this picture.
No way Crooks climbed over either fence. He either walked up Evans City or Meridian Road after leaving the vendor area near the airstrip. There are no sidewalks along either road but I’m supposing foot traffic was pretty intense along both roads this day. @vegaspatriot completed a detailed assessment of how Crooks most likely left the vendor area and I agree with his findings. I walked the same route and it’s the quickest and only way around the fences. The last red dot heading north along Evans City Road gets you past the last fence.
SImple, the SS agent was a women as you know for sure. And Trump himself didn’t want to go without his shoes, which is understandable for many reasons, especially considering the state of shock in the aftermath of a combined physical and psychological trauma-
@vt1 are you using a more accurate survey method than Google Maps to identify the shooter’s location? When we compare the satellite photos from 2020, 2021 and 2023 we see the roofline move North/South by 1 m between versions. But I suppose since you are consistently using the 2021 imagery for your analysis, those variations won’t cause an issue.
There is about a 5 m difference between what I’ve been using for the podium location and what you derived. I plan to look into this at some point, but I’m taking a break from any additional analysis for a while and hoping that someone else will publish something comprehensive soon. I may dive back into it later this week.