Agreed! I just posted on that same comment without first reading through this round.
1 Like
It appears to me that rifle shot #2 came from the SS counter-sniper atop the near barn, aiming toward Crooks, but strangely aiming high over him as his rifle barrel jerks up.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1812584348375290240?t=vENa9danJFGx4u7-J2ypbg&s=19
2 Likes
A lighter grain bullet might be moving at 3200 ft per second. The delta between that and the speed of sound of about 1100 ft/sec. Gives us a delta of 2100 ft per sec. Multiply at .22 = 462 ft and that is a radius of a circle from Trumps mic. For the first shot. The fact that there are different times between the initial bullet and the report and those subsequent shots gives a good indication of two possible three guns. It is reasonable to assume the same ammo and velocity if indeed there are multiple shooters. I always liked geometry.
1 Like
The reason Trump’s mic cut out:
Public address systems have dynamic range compression circuits (called a compressor for short). It’s like a robot that is constantly adjusting the volume knob with the goal of keeping a constant volume.
Imagine an evangelist at a church who shouts and screams one moment, then whispers for effect the next moment. The compressor keeps a constant volume so that the shouting doesn’t get too loud yet the whisper can still be heard.
A loud input to the microphone would cause to the compressor to lower the volume. The time it takes to lower the volume is a setting called the attack time. The time that the volume is held low is called the release time. The audio engineer will adjust these settings to his liking.
Dynamic range compressors used to be a speparate audio component in the sound system rack. Nowadays, modern mixing consoles have compressors built into each channel.
For a PA system, microphones probably do not have compression circuits themselves.
Background: I have a degree in computer and electrical engineering and spent 20 years running a sound system for my local church.
10 Likes
No, the Solari report on the “attempted assassination attempt” is still up, behind the paywall. It’s the “Money and Markets” report for July 18.
Catherine Austin Fitts is 100% certain the assassination attempt was theater. Quote:
I sat down this morning and said, what could explain this as a legitimate assassination attempt? I said, gross incompetence on the part of the secret service, to an inexplicable degree. Plus, gross incompetence on the part of the assassin, to an inexplicable degree. Plus, divine intervention protecting Donald Trump. All of which, in combination, wouldn’t even go in the movies."
I was also amused to see that Kevin Barrett at Unz.com is still beating the drum for the hoax theory. He came up with this clip showing Hulk Hogan pulling his shirt apart while Trump watches, smirking.
Barrett wrote:
Hogan’s message was unmistakeable: “It’s all kayfabe!” Obviously someone who was genuinely angry that their hero had been shot, and who was sincerely expressing that anger, would not look remotely like this. … So when Hogan symbolically “unveils the truth” (that the shooting was kayfabe) by ripping off his shirt, with Trump smirking in the background, the crowd falls into a trance of “believing” while at some deeper unconscious level knowing it’s all fake.
Fitts and Barrett are serious people, folks. Not trolls. It’s time to remember that open-mindedness, curiosity, avoidance of ideological rigidity, respect and empathy are considered virtues at this site.
4 Likes
I think what you might have seen there on the quieting after the cracks is Automatic Gain Control (AGC). On my ham radio I can adjust this to have a time constant of 0.3s, 3s, and 6s. The idea is to keep the sound at a constant level so if it gets too loud, it turns down the gain, and vice versa. I think lots of audio circuits use something like this.
2 Likes
Wow! A truly incredible analysis, a PHD level mental investigation/dot-connection, and all really well communicated so that we can follow along with your logical trail. Thank you! I hope that you are called to testify before congress, and sooner rather than later. These facts now show extensively that this was indeed a full fledged deep state operation to assassinate Trump. Yet with the collaboration of the complicit legacy media, these devils still believe that they can just do anything, even out in board daylight, and still get away with it by just telling ever more lies!
7 Likes
I agree: a wonderful analysis, with great communication, and it’s the sort of analysis Congress should be calling on. Only one point I still think deserves more careful consideration:
OR, that there was a full fledged deep state operation to FAKE an assassination attempt on Trump…
1 Like
To add to the previous- i don’t know the time markings on the other recordings. But if a different recording had say .135 seconds between bullet and report for the same shot #1 and we use the same 3200 ft/sec minus 1100 ft/sec- then the radius of that that circle is 256 ft and those two circles will intersect in two places. A third recording should overlap at one of those places. The two margins of error are not knowing the true muzzle velocity and pinpointing to the correct thousandths of the second the time from bullet to report.
2 Likes
There’s something interesting about the body-cam video on the AGR roof . There’s no SHELL CASINGS to be seen . There is four officers standing around talking in the area where they should have been ejected . Did they roll off the slopey slope?
3 Likes
Given these evidence/facts, I’d say that that opinion is close to 98% likely to be an extension of the deep state’s ongoing “counter-information” lies and obfuscation campaign.
Edit: God knows that they’re now here on this site, don’t you think?
4 Likes
I don’t know if I am allowed to post a link…but going to try…info about Trump shooting:
Not trying to promote any other web site…
1 Like
Chris stated early on that he thought this theory of Trump having faked it is insane. And it is. We can see the bullets hitting all kinds of things - causing one death and two badly wounded. A hydraulic line spraying out the pressure. Avoiding stupid speculative ideas that are based on zero hard evidence is not ideological rigidity… rather it’s critical thinking.
9 Likes
An objection to my theory that a rifle shot at Trump from a second story room is that the line of sight from the window to the people who were killed or injured in the left and right bleacher seats and Trump at the podium do not line up. Also, The FBI director testified today in Congress that eight bullet shell casings were collected near Crook’s body. So strong evidence must be gathered if this testimony is to be refuted.
2 Likes
Analyzing more audio here: even compensating for drift between devices (and there is a small amount), SOURCE 4 SHOT 9 is at least 350ms later than Trump’s mic - wouldn’t that mean that shot 9 could be no less than 420ft from source 4?
?WAS SHOT 9 THE SS SNIPER?
If so, who was shot 10?
Someone check my math plz.
edit: checking myself, I’m not subtracting the distance of the snipers nest in those numbers. However, adding back a bit for the distance of the sniper from the podium and still taking account the significant delay on source4, I’m all but certain shot9 was in fact a SS sniper and NOT an officer nearby.
1 Like
Source Four is key!
From Source Four it is undeniable that the first shot was MUCH louder than shots two and three. Two bystanders in the bleachers to Trump’s left (as he faced crowd) went down after the first shot and before the second shot and they were hit with two different bullets.
TWO Deep State shooters fired their weapons after a countdown into their earphones which allowed them to fire simultaneously just as a military honor guard does when giving a 21 gun salute.
The two shots appeared to be one shot but combined were louder than shots 2 and 3. They could only coordinate one simultaneous shot so one of the two shooters took only one shot.
This is not a hypothesis. Look at the video of the two bystanders and their positions in the bleachers. There is no single bullet trajectory that could have hit Trump and then the two bystanders.
4 Likes
Another idea, and maybe you already preparing for this, you could measure time delay between at least three audios, and triangulate to find exactly location for each group. Assuming 1-3 is gun 1 and 4-8 is gun 2 and 9 is gun 3, measure from 1 to 4 to 9. That way, you aren’t measuring from echos which could be all over the place. If 9 lines up with 1, and 4 is different that would prove the theory that 1-3 and 9 are from same location, perhaps window.
1 Like
Maybe the first three shots originated from a rifle inside the room on the second story. Then audio diffraction effects would take place as the sound of the shots passed through the open window. See: “Diffraction of Sound” Diffraction of Sound In microphone position #4, the mic has a fairly unobstructed line to the rifle on the roof, and there is the wall of the two story building nearby to produce the echoes, making shots 4,5,6,7 sound louder and different from shots 1,2,3.
3 Likes
A bullet flying near a microphone is recorded as a snap sound because of the sonic boom caused by the bullet flying faster than the speed of sound. The sound wave of the rifle shot arrives at the microphone some time later traveling at the speed of sound and is heard as a bang. Knowing the time difference between when the snap sound arrives at the microphone and the rifle shot bang sound arrives at the microphone, it is possible to calculate how far away (D) from the microphone the rifle is. In general, distance D = velocity V times travel time T. Time of flight of the bullet Tb = D/Vb where Vb is the bullet velocity. Time of flight of the “bang” sound pulse is Ts = D/Vs where Vs is the speed of sound. So:
TS - Tb = ( D/Vs) - (D/Vb)
This equation can be manipulated using laws of Algebra to give us a formula for D
D = VbVs(Ts - Tb)/(Vb - Vs)
This analysis ignores the time it takes from the expanding shock wave cone of sound from the nearby speeding bullet to reach the microphone. This equation will not work if the flight path of the bullet is far away from the microphone and the speed of sound of the shock wave must be taken into account.
4 Likes
Suppressors have a “first round pop”, has it been considered that for the first shot fired?